1952 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Camry. (267 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Camry |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2999 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 267 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2730 mm |