1952 Buick 40 vs. 2007 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2007 Peugeot 607 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Peugeot 607 (208 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Peugeot 607, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Peugeot 607 (294 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2007 Peugeot 607 | |
Make | Buick | Peugeot |
Model | 40 | 607 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2946 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 294 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2810 mm |