1952 Buick 40 vs. 2008 Ford GT
To start off, 2008 Ford GT is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford GT (493 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 375 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2008 Ford GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford GT (678 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2008 Ford GT | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | GT |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 678 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 105.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2720 mm |