1952 Buick 40 vs. 2008 Opel Astra
To start off, 2008 Opel Astra is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2008 Opel Astra.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Astra. (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Astra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Buick 40 | 2008 Opel Astra | |
| Make | Buick | Opel |
| Model | 40 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1596 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 292 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2620 mm |
