1952 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Buick 40 (118 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (142 Nm). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2009 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 292 Nm | 142 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1720 mm |