1952 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (498 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 498 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2950 mm |