1952 Buick 40 vs. 2011 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2011 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Buick 40 (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Buick 40 | 2011 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Buick | Proton |
| Model | 40 | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 292 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2610 mm |
