1952 Buick 40 vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Buick 40 | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Buick | Holden |
| Model | 40 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 292 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
