1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 1953 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1953 Humber Pullman is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 265 kg more than 1952 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Cadillac 62 | 1953 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Cadillac | Humber |
| Model | 62 | Pullman |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 4138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3330 mm |
