1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 1958 Mercedes-Benz 190
To start off, 1958 Mercedes-Benz 190 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1958 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Cadillac 62 | 1958 Mercedes-Benz 190 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | 190 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2410 mm |
