1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 1994 Citroen AX
To start off, 1994 Citroen AX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1207 kg more than 1994 Citroen AX.
Because 1952 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Citroen AX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Cadillac 62 | 1994 Citroen AX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | 62 | AX |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 48 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 668 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2290 mm |
