1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 900 kg more than 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Because 1952 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | 62 | Wagon R+ |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2340 mm |
