1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW X5 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1952 Cadillac 62.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Cadillac 62 | 2002 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | BMW |
| Model | 62 | X5 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 2977 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2170 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2730 mm |
