1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 385 kg more than 2002 Subaru Outback.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | 62 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2660 mm |
