1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 5665 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 295 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
