1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 360 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |