1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 58 kg more than 2013 Cadillac XTS.
Because 1952 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | 62 | XTS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1852 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2831 mm |