1952 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2013 Nissan Armada is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Armada weights approximately 777 kg more than 1952 Cadillac 62.
Because 2013 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Armada |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 313 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2652 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3130 mm |