1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1974 Volvo 140 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (95 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | DeLuxe | 140 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 84.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |
