1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 1989 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1989 Holden Apollo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 192 kg more than 1989 Holden Apollo.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 1989 Holden Apollo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | DeLuxe | Apollo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |
