1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL (317 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 443 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | DeLuxe | SL |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 4973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |