1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna (141 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 23 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 1996 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | DeLuxe | Magna |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2351 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 86.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 100 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1374 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2730 mm |
