1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 1998 Ford Royale
To start off, 1998 Ford Royale is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 1998 Ford Royale | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | DeLuxe | Royale |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2560 mm |