1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 113 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 1998 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | DeLuxe | Magna |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 3497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2730 mm |
