1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 1999 Lincoln LS
To start off, 1999 Lincoln LS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln LS (249 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln LS weights approximately 313 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 1999 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
| Model | DeLuxe | LS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 3934 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 249 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |
