1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 4,164 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RSC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota RSC (194 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 1 kg more than 2001 Toyota RSC.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | DeLuxe | RSC |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 4164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1396 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2510 mm |
