1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (161 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 323 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | DeLuxe | E |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 68.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |