1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2004 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2004 Ford Expedition is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Expedition (232 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Expedition weights approximately 970 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2004 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | DeLuxe | Expedition |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 4603 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 2367 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 106 L |