1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,931 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 10 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | DeLuxe | Mustang |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 3931 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 84.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1387 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |