1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 188 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | DeLuxe | Taurus |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |