1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 362 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | DeLuxe | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 80.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 48 L |