1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2004 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2004 Skoda Octavia is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Skoda Octavia (113 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 72 kg more than 2004 Skoda Octavia.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2004 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | DeLuxe | Octavia |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 92.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |