1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | DeLuxe | MX-Flexa |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2760 mm |