1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe (85 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 582 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | DeLuxe | ForFour |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 1099 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 63 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 84.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 47 L |