1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2006 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota RunX (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2006 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | DeLuxe | RunX |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 91.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |