1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | DeLuxe | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2922 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 268 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1438 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |
