1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | DeLuxe | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 102 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3010 mm |
