1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 28 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | DeLuxe | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 1306 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |
