1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | DeLuxe | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 233 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |
