1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | DeLuxe | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 143 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2490 mm |
