1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2010 Opel Combo
To start off, 2010 Opel Combo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2010 Opel Combo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | DeLuxe | Combo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 80.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 52 L |