1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 422 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | DeLuxe | Equator |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |
