1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2012 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 599 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2012 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | DeLuxe | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1996 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4823 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1925 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2789 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 87 L |
