1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 787 kg more than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | DeLuxe | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3546 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 2184 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1925 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 87 L |