1952 Chrysler Windsor vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1952 Chrysler Windsor. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1952 Chrysler Windsor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chrysler Windsor weights approximately 166 kg more than 2010 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Chrysler Windsor | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Windsor | Tundra |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4918 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3710 mm |