1952 Citroen 11 vs. 1967 Volvo 120
To start off, 1967 Volvo 120 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,909 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Citroen 11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Volvo 120 (89 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Citroen 11 weights approximately 181 kg more than 1967 Volvo 120.
Because 1967 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Citroen 11 | 1967 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 11 | 120 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1014 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2610 mm |