1952 Citroen 11 vs. 1992 Volvo 240
To start off, 1992 Volvo 240 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 240 (96 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 240 weights approximately 101 kg more than 1952 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Citroen 11 | 1992 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 11 | 240 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2660 mm |