1952 Citroen 11 vs. 1994 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1994 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Mustang weights approximately 195 kg more than 1952 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Citroen 11 | 1994 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 11 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1952 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2580 mm |