1952 Citroen 11 vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 3,931 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 11. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 516 kg more than 1952 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Citroen 11 | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
Model | 11 | LS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 3931 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 280 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3030 mm |