1952 Citroen 11 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 676 kg more than 1952 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Citroen 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Citroen 11 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | 11 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1909 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1871 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5127 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3032 mm |
